It's funny how after one day the lovely little storm we had is given the title "The Blizzard of 2007". For all we know, in February we may have a blizzard that buries our houses and kills everyone. Or in March we could have a Blizzard that turns Sask Place (or whatever the hell it's called these days) into a giant snow cone. I think if we're gonna name a storm, instead of calling it THE Blizzard of 2007, we should call it "Mable" or "Bernie" or "Ozzy". Then if another bigger one comes along, we just name it something more butch than this one and we don't look stupid.
PS; First person to tell me why you would call a blizzard "Ozzy" wins a prize.
PPS; There isn't really a prize.
Comments
i definately agree about calling it the blizzard of 2007. i thought that was rather idiotic. i was going to write a silly guess about "ozzy" but i can already see you shaking your head at me so i won't bother. i'll just wait till someone guesses right and tell you that that's what i was gonna guess :)
Posted by: helen![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.mennoboy.com/bigboots/nav-commenters.gif)
|
January 12, 2007 4:14 AM
Well my optimistic friend I hope that February DOESN'T cover ya'll in the storm of a century. However, I suppose one might say that it could happen, after all every other place seems to have some horrible doom to look forward to. Isn't Vancouver supposed to fall off into the sea, and Halifax supposed to me hit by a tsunami once Greenland melts?...So Maybe Saskatoon will be buried in snow after all.
Posted by: amelia![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.mennoboy.com/bigboots/nav-commenters.gif)
|
January 12, 2007 6:31 AM
the answer to the question is Ozzy Osborne released an album called "The Blizzard of Oz"
Posted by: eustace (matt w)![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.mennoboy.com/bigboots/nav-commenters.gif)
|
January 15, 2007 9:01 PM