timmy's tats
i've been talking alot of sh*t about timmy c's (of RATM and Audioslave) tattoos. well maybe it should only be considered one. anyway, here's something to look at. the amount of area it covers is actually similar to what i would do if i ever got the nerve and the 20-30 grand. it'd be that much because i'd have really detailed art nouveau designs instead of pitch.
Comments
That's a whole lotta ink.
Posted by: Lo | July 28, 2004 10:44 PM
that would hurt sooo bad!!
Posted by: Pamela | July 29, 2004 12:52 AM
I've toyed with the idea of a tattoo, but it'd be lower back, small, and it'd have to have a lot of personal meaning - you have the sucker till you die, or have a really painful laser tattoo removal. Ouch. This guy though, that's blech. He's gonna be one ugly lookin' grandpa. (with crazy stories for the grandkids)
Posted by: mel | July 29, 2004 4:20 AM
i have four, but they are little, and they all mean something. i think that is the only way i would do them.. i want to get 2 more..
Posted by: Pamela | July 29, 2004 5:08 AM
please, for the love of god, don't get a tattoo on your lower back. that is so trendy (on verge of trend f***ing even.)
Posted by: ma wiebe | July 29, 2004 5:26 AM
apparently that tattoo has gotten infected in numerous places, thus being more painful and actuallly pussing and such. ouch. timmy's a tough guy though (and massive as you can see.) at one of the MTV video awards he climbed up on a part of the stage decoration and started moving it back and forth. needless to say the security guards were not that friendly.
Posted by: ma wiebe | July 29, 2004 5:30 AM
never on my lower back, and never butterflies.. "that is so last season!!!" ahhahahhaha i know what you are saying tho... i don't normally do stuff just because other people are...
Posted by: Pamela | July 29, 2004 1:39 PM
Oh if only you knew me better. I am not getting a tattoo (if I do) on my lower back, to be trendy. I do what I do because I like it. If a gazillion other people are doing it, or have done it, so what. I don't think I've ever gone with what's, in season. What is that anyway. I would get one there because of the profession I'm in. I don't want it to show in church, wearing a skirt or summer dress, and I don't want it out there for all my students to see. It's private, and that's why I'd want it there. Sheesh. If I do get one, it'll be there. Because I want it to be.
Posted by: mel | July 30, 2004 9:44 PM
I just booked an appointment to have mine done at Smiling Buddha. We'll see if I chicken out.
Not telling what it is or where it is going (nowhere that will stretch excessively!)
It's a secret.
Posted by: Lo | July 30, 2004 10:43 PM
she must be going with the barcode on the forehead. that wouldn't stretch hardly at all.
Posted by: kirk | July 31, 2004 12:49 AM
i'm not saying you're trying to be trendy, i'm saying getting one there is trendy. lift up the back of a girl 18-28's shirt (which i don't suggest doing) and i would guess 50% would have a tattoo there. it's also not anywhere you can see it, so why? ah well, its not my back. as the satanic church of america says "do what thou wilt."
the barcode is a cool idea, but get one on your hand and your forehead. that way you're ready for the end.
Posted by: ma wiebe | July 31, 2004 12:56 AM
Nope, but good try.
It isn't done yet and may never get done.
Posted by: Lo | July 31, 2004 10:15 PM
That's where I'm at...who knows.
Posted by: mel | August 2, 2004 12:24 AM